Until I am able to put together a better summary, please take a look at these files:
An excerpt from an article by John Ankerberg, a leading Christian apologist, on "The Quality of the Evidence for Christianity" (38K). After you've read that, use your 'BACK' button to come back here and continue:
A maillist discussion started by my offer to rebut that article. The file is long (about 167K), but contains arguments on both sides.
Critique of John Warwick Montgomery's Legal Evidences For Christianity: Montgomery asserts that Christianity's claims survive examination using the legal tests for evidence. He does this only by misstating and twisting the rules of evidence and the facts. (The Ankerberg article relied heavily on Montgomery's arguments.) (64K)